6
such responsibility or, at least, responsibility for
the cost of removal, in agreeing to the deferment of
the payment of £5,000 of the last instalment of the $2,000,000.
We should ?
Write to the Admiralty with reference to correspondence terminating in (3) and with particular reference to (21) on 92608/32 reaffirming the view
that under the terms of the agreement they are required
to hand over the Naval Arsenal Yard free of emcumbrances
saying (18) on 92608/ that the Jar Office are unwilling to bear any portion
of the cost of diverting the ropeway, and suggesting
32
that steps to that end should be taken by the
Admiralty, on the understanding that should the new
line of the ropeway pass over any part of the
Arsenal Yard the estimated amount of the consequential
4. (6) m 92608/32 depreciation thereof should be deducted from the last
Add that, as understood in (24),
instalment due from the Hong Kong Government.
Suqquot
Je might that should the Admiralty,
for any reason, be unwilling to agree to this course the Hong Kong Government should be authorised to arrange in conjunction with the Military Authorities, for the
diversion of the ropeway,
of division
,
and to
charge the cost, together with the depreciation
A
A
in the value of the Naval Arsenal Yard in the event of
its being necessary to carry the ropeway over any
portion of it, against the final instalment of the payment of $2,000,000.
(We should await the reply from the Admiralty before communicating with the .ar Office or
the sum of approximatel £5000 will
le deduchd Hong Kong.) from the final instalment If necessary, hending settlement. I.E. Bader
28.
27-8-34.
an Daya
FM
Foam to see diff
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.